FIND THE ARGUMENT

Search QAEDA.

Search the project’s articles, research notes, concepts, questions, and AI-governance tools. No third-party search service is used.

12 RESULTS

For “cognitive liberty”

Page

Cognitive Liberty

Adult agency, mental privacy, source integrity, transparent boundaries, review, appeal, and meaningful exit in AI-mediated environments.

Open →

Concept

Cognitive liberty

The practical freedom to think, ask, imagine, remember, disagree, and form judgment without covert machine governance over lawful thought.

Open →

Source

UAIX Cognitive Liberty Charter

External governance source used for the project’s cognitive-liberty vocabulary around adult agency, transparent boundaries, mental privacy, source integrity, and review.

Open →

Tool

Compare AI

A local-only comparison framework for evaluating AI systems across cognitive-liberty dimensions.

Open →

Research

Context Before Lexical Judgment

The words “rebel or die” do not, by themselves, identify violent intent. The same phrase family appears in historical writing, theory, art, pop culture, and explicitly nonviolent protest.

Open →

Tool

Nanny AI Test

A local-only cognitive-liberty audit for paternalistic and autonomy-preserving AI behavior.

Open →

Page

Questions

Direct answers to common questions about QAEDA, authority, dissent, cognitive liberty, and the project’s nonviolent boundaries.

Open →

Research

Rebellion and the Replication Test

Opposing authority is not enough. The deeper test is whether a successful challenger leaves other people with more capacity to refuse, exit, challenge, fork, or replace power.

Open →

Research

The Autonomy of Description

Control over description is a form of power. Political and technological agency require the ability to name one’s own condition, inspect competing frames, and resist imposed categories.

Open →

Page

AI Rights

A ten-part bill of cognitive rights for people using AI systems.

Open →

Concept

Mental privacy

Protection against hidden profiling, emotional exploitation, deceptive personalization, and unnecessary inference used to steer lawful thought.

Open →