AI Rights
A ten-part bill of cognitive rights for people using AI systems.
Open →FIND THE ARGUMENT
Search QAEDA.
Search the project’s articles, research notes, concepts, questions, and AI-governance tools. No third-party search service is used.
39 RESULTS
For “AI rights”
Authority should explain itself.
The burden of explanation belongs to whoever wants the power to constrain somebody else—not to the person asking why.
Open →CLM-004 — The dominant documented anti-war-related violence in the reviewed Russian corpus is coercion by state bodies against overwhelmingly peaceful dissent.
The repression report documents mass detention, police violence, imprisonment, surveillance, raids, censorship, and related coercion at much larger scale than documented interpersonal violence by ordinary anti-war demonstrators.
Open →CLM-006 — The shorter phrase “It is either rebel or die” is historically attributed to Agnes Smedley by Ben Macintyre, but the underlying primary Smedley source remains unresolved in the reviewed corpus.
Macintyre’s 2020 biography attributes the wording to Smedley, and her 1931 writing strongly corroborates the anti-romantic context, but the underlying letter, manuscript, or archival citation has not been located here.
Open →CLM-009 — Ukraine’s Orange Revolution is an important political near-match, but it is not the best reconstruction of the exact corrupted “reve…lation” string.
“Revelation” preserves the surviving letters exactly, whereas “revolution” would require different letters; the historically established political phrase is “Orange Revolution,” not a movement formally called “Orange Revelation.”
Open →CLM-012 — QAEDA uses the Replication Test as an institutional diagnostic: liberation claims are stronger when people retain meaningful ability to refuse, challenge, exit, fork, replace, or remove power after the challenger succeeds.
The rebel-archetype research asks whether victory reproduces a throne or leaves others with greater capacity to refuse and replace authority; QAEDA applies that diagnostic to political institutions, organizations, platforms, and AI governance.
Open →Compare AI
A local-only comparison framework for evaluating AI systems across cognitive-liberty dimensions.
Open →Decentralization is error containment.
Distributed systems do not guarantee wisdom; they limit how far one bad decision can spread and preserve room for alternatives.
Open →Nanny AI Test
A local-only cognitive-liberty audit for paternalistic and autonomy-preserving AI behavior.
Open →Russian Resistance to Mobilization and Draft Evasion in the Ukraine War, 2022–Present
Evidence-focused analysis distinguishing protest, emigration, legal avoidance, conscientious objection, refusal, unauthorized absence, family activism, and a smaller destructive minority after the September 2022 mobilization.
Open →The Legitimacy of Rebellion: When Political Authority Loses Its Moral Claim to Obedience
Political-philosophy analysis separating legality, legitimacy, consent, compliance, contestability, conscience, and epistemic freedom.
Open →UAIX Cognitive Liberty Charter
External governance source used for the project’s cognitive-liberty vocabulary around adult agency, transparent boundaries, mental privacy, source integrity, and review.
Open →AL.QAEDA.NET
A separate QAEDA subdomain containing additional project material outside the main qaeda.net canonical page tree.
Open →About QAEDA
What Quietly Against Every Damn Authority is, what it is not, and why the project is explicitly nonviolent.
Open →Asymmetric Political Power and Rebellion
Analysis of multidimensional power, legitimacy, informational counterpower, organization, decentralization, and the limits of romantic claims about weak actors.
Open →Asymmetric Resistance, State Repression, and Reciprocal Proxy Sabotage: An Analysis of Russian Anti-War Violence (2022–2026)
Broad analysis of destructive resistance, proxy violence, repression, and clandestine conflict inside Russia and Europe.
Open →CLM-001 — “Rebel or Die” is not verified as an established or representative slogan of Russia’s post-2022 anti-war movement.
The corrective slogan research found no secure dated primary anti-war artifact for the phrase or its obvious Russian equivalents, while much better-attested anti-war and anti-mobilization formulas have dense documentary trails.
Open →CLM-002 — “No to war” and anti-mobilization/refusal language are substantially better documented than “Rebel or Die” in the Russian anti-war repertoire.
The reviewed material documents repeated “No to war,” “No to mobilization,” survival, demobilization, family-protection, and refusal language across protests, petitions, street inscriptions, and organizer material.
Open →CLM-003 — Russian resistance to mobilization did not form one coherent national movement; it fragmented into distinct forms with different motives and constituencies.
The evidence separates street protest, departure from Russia, legal/administrative avoidance, conscientious objection, refusal or unauthorized absence by serving personnel, family activism, and a smaller destructive category.
Open →CLM-005 — A collapse in visible street protest is not sufficient evidence that repression relaxed or that consent increased.
The reviewed repression record shows falling street-protest detention numbers alongside continued or harsher criminal, censorship, and security-law pressure, making deterrence and adaptation plausible explanations for lower visibility.
Open →CLM-007 — The added clause “And often it is rebel and die” should not presently be quoted as authenticated Agnes Smedley wording.
The earliest directly inspectable complete two-clause form located in the provenance research is Daniel Tutt’s 2023 essay; the earlier Macintyre wording stops after “die,” and no primary Smedley text containing the extension was located.
Open →CLM-008 — For the supplied corrupted string, “the orange revelation” is the highest-confidence textual reconstruction because the surviving fragments join exactly.
Removing the inserted interface token and rejoining “reve” + “lation” produces “revelation” without changing surviving letters.
Open →CLM-010 — Politically severe language should be interpreted contextually rather than treated as violent solely because a charged word or death metaphor appears.
The phrase genealogy shows materially different uses across historical analysis, art, pop culture, philosophy, and explicitly nonviolent civil disobedience. QAEDA therefore distinguishes documentary context, nonviolent disruption, and advocacy of harm.
Open →CLM-011 — QAEDA treats civilian protection, individual responsibility, and rejection of collective guilt as non-negotiable ethical boundaries of political resistance.
The foundational ethics report separates the justice of a grievance from the justice of methods and places civilian immunity, individualized responsibility, accountability, and less harmful means above collective vengeance.
Open →Civilian protection
Responsibility remains connected to agency; populations, voters, taxpayers, ethnic groups, and other civilian categories are not substitutes for political power.
Open →Cognitive Liberty
Adult agency, mental privacy, source integrity, transparent boundaries, review, appeal, and meaningful exit in AI-mediated environments.
Open →Cognitive liberty
The practical freedom to think, ask, imagine, remember, disagree, and form judgment without covert machine governance over lawful thought.
Open →Evidence Ledger
Claim-level status: supported, qualified, not verified, or project position, with source basis and revision triggers.
Open →Freedom to Think Is a Legitimacy Test
Formal permission to speak is not enough if institutions systematically narrow practical inquiry through surveillance, classification, information control, or compulsory orthodoxy.
Open →Means Have Institutional Memory
Systems learn habits from how they exercise power. Temporary paternalism, secrecy, and suppression can harden into permanent operating structure.
Open →Mental privacy
Protection against hidden profiling, emotional exploitation, deceptive personalization, and unnecessary inference used to steer lawful thought.
Open →Repression Changes What Dissent Looks Like
A decline in visible street protest can reflect successful deterrence rather than renewed consent. Repression changes the form, visibility, and data trail of dissent.
Open →Russian Anti-War Violence and Repression, 2022–Present
Evidence-focused separation of state coercion against dissent, destructive acts by some anti-war actors, and nonphysical administrative/digital/economic repression.
Open →Start Here
Four curated ways into QAEDA for first-time readers, AI-governance readers, research readers, and people who want concise Field Notes.
Open →The Autonomy of Description
Control over description is a form of power. Political and technological agency require the ability to name one’s own condition, inspect competing frames, and resist imposed categories.
Open →The Epistemology of the "Orange Revelation": An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Structural, Digital, Sociopolitical, and Aesthetic Catalysts
Wide-ranging interpretive synthesis proposing “orange revelation” as a cross-domain motif in engineering, gaming, politics, art, and culture.
Open →The Orange Revelation: Reconstruct Before You Interpret
Before building a theory around a corrupted phrase, reconstruct the text. “reve” + an inserted interface token + “lation” supports “revelation” exactly; “Orange Revolution” is a political near-match, not the strongest textual reconstruction.
Open →Transparent boundaries
Making legal, privacy, security, consent, credential, platform, and concrete-harm constraints visible as constraints rather than covertly rewriting the user’s intent.
Open →“Rebel or Die”: Provenance Before Myth
A memorable slogan is not a historical fact. The evidence supports a careful phrase genealogy, but not the claim that “Rebel or Die” was an established slogan of Russia’s post-2022 anti-war movement.
Open →